<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>HCI 2009 Archive</title>
  <link>https://hci2009.org/</link>
  <description>Preserving the conversations that shaped UX</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:25:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://hci2009.org/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <item>
    <title>Fingers Before Glass: Reassessing the 2009 Mobile Interaction Track</title>
    <link>https://hci2009.org/fingers-before-glass-reassessing-2009-mobile-interaction-track/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hci2009.org/fingers-before-glass-reassessing-2009-mobile-interaction-track/</guid>
    <description>The mobile interaction papers preserved from HCI 2009 record a discipline caught between keypads and capacitive glass. This retrospective examines what the track got right about touch, context and small-screen usability — and which of its confident predictions now read as period pieces.</description>
    <author>HCI 2009 Archive</author>
    <category>Conference Retrospective</category>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 20:23:59 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Same Five Fights: UK Debates on Interface Design That Were Already on the 2009 Programme</title>
    <link>https://hci2009.org/same-five-fights-uk-interface-design-debates-2009-programme/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hci2009.org/same-five-fights-uk-interface-design-debates-2009-programme/</guid>
    <description>Accessibility, participation, measurement, intuition and ecological validity: five arguments that filled rooms in 2009 and continue to fill them in 2026. A listicle drawn from the archive, with current UK examples, on why UX research keeps returning to the same contested ground.</description>
    <author>HCI 2009 Archive</author>
    <category>Opinion</category>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 20:23:59 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>